Creating a Secure CHURCH
PART 1 : Objectives & Obstacles
Chapter 2 : History & Ministry
2.3 Our Church History
What are the things from the past that shape the nature of our church, how it came to be, how it actually is in reality today? Remember we are looking at these things because they can hinder us being or becoming a secure church.
I’ve said here the things that shape ‘our’ church because I believe it is easier to think about these things practically when we consider the local church, the expression of it to which we belong. The following are some of those factors that come from our history, our past. They are just some examples of the sort of things that get in the way.
Denomination or Group
Being part of a denomination, group or stream should not be the issue here but so often it can be. If denominational or group loyalty and practice has become very strong, it often becomes easy to forget this ‘fundamental nature of Jesus’ that I’m talking about that should be there to help create real security. Instead we may replace it with an artificial security that is an emotional feeling based upon a building, a form of service, our denomination or group, or even ‘our history’.
Whether it be denominational, or free, or new churches, the danger is always lurking, that we conform to a particular way of thinking, that lacks the crucial characteristics of the person of Jesus Christ. Why should it be like that? Because it is so easy to focus on “other issues”, things that are important to our group that are other than these characteristics we’ve been considering.
Having been part of a large denominational church in the past, I am aware that it is only natural to feel secure because we’re part of a large institution, it’s only natural to feel secure when we’re part of a large organisation, but the church was never meant to be an institution or organisation and such feelings of security are actually expressions of false security that we referred to in Book One.
Consideration: Dare we face why we are like we are? Have we made the values and name of our church group, the things from which we gain our sense of security? Are we afraid of new things so that the Holy Spirit is not allowed to touch our hallowed ways? Indeed if other Christians met me, would they be able to identify the group or denomination I come from by the language I use, or the particular practices we hold onto that may not be so godly and righteous as we think? We may be living in a fools’ paradise.
Crisis Situations
A church that is going through a crisis easily loses focus. The crisis may be one of pastor versus deacons, leaders versus the rest, disagreement over a building project, upset because of lack of communication, the list is endless. In such situations the ‘issue’ becomes all-important and the enemy has a habit of helping us forget what we’re about. In such a situation people try to create an artificial security for themselves that is based on the paper-thin belief that “We’re right!” or “They’re wrong!”
In such situations there is almost a security in what I can only describe as a crusading spirit, where we take up arms to ‘fight for justice’ or ‘fight for right’. In fact we are very often destroying what is good and right in the name of justice. In a confrontational conflict, words like “love, acceptance, respect and caring” take a back seat, and truth may be far from us.
Consider by way of illustration, the scene in the first chapter, where Pastor John suddenly finds himself confronted by his other leaders with a demand that he resigns. What are the indicators in that situation that say that here is an insecure church?
• It was a church that focused on ministry and programmes and little on open, personal relationships.
• The church was too busy and people didn’t have time to get close. As a result there was a measure of unreality that was felt by many but recognised by few.
• In their growing frustration at seeing a number of ongoing, unreal areas of church life (as they saw it) and being powerless to do anything about it (as they felt it), the other leaders began to discuss their frustrations behind Pastor John’s back. It all happened so gradually that none of them noticed it. Indeed they each quietly justified it by “we are right”.
• Accepting that perhaps Pastor John had become stale, services had become lifeless and communication was zero at the top, the other leaders exhibited their insecurity by bringing about the Conference Room Coup with no room for talking. The lines had been drawn long back, without any awareness on Pastor John’s part. He had learned long ago to look positively on all aspects of church life, and this had now meant he missed the growing wave of grievance right before him.
• The result was that the Pastor, who desperately needed care and consideration himself, was suddenly alone, feeling very needy, and was wondering whatever had happened. It would take him months if not years to understand the dynamics behind the coup.
After such a crisis, the church is not the same. Where there is a split, leadership loss, general upheaval or whatever, if we use the Scriptural analogy of the church being Jesus’ body, it’s like the body has been through a major accident or trauma. Many people are in a state of shock, because such a thing is completely contrary to the working of the Holy Spirit and He is severely grieved (Eph 4:30). How important it is, therefore, that we seek to do all we can to avoid such things happening.
Consideration: When next there seems a conflict of ideas or of principles, dare we stand back and lay down our stronghold and seek to view everything through a filter of the fruit of the Spirit (Gal 5:22,23)? As soon as we sense a loss of these fruit, can we lay down our arms and call a cease to the potential conflict?
The Latest Project
Churches are good at projects and when there is a project on the agenda then mundane issues such as the very environment of church life get forgotten. The focus is placed on the goal of the project and everything and everyone can become subservient to it. Concern for individuals can often be the price paid to achieve ‘great things’. It’s only years later, as we view the scattered bodies who are the casualties, might we wonder about what we achieved.
Consideration: Is it possible to be a project church AND have the environment I’ve referred to? Yes, but I suspect there are various checks and controls we need to have to do it:
• Is the project the brain-child of one person, or has it been owned by the whole church?
• Has it been owned by the whole church by a vision being caught instead of being imposed, so that people who aren’t so clear on it aren’t made to feel bad?
• Does the project mean the people of the church feel excited by faith instead of being under pressure to give or to work?
• Have we become so caught up in our project that we have lost sight of the environmental factors referred to in this chapter?